rfc-review

Score game design RFCs by applying a structured rubric across core loop, progression, economy, player motivation, risk, and cross-consistency dimensions, yielding a weighted total score with clear deductions for design health assessment.

An RFC health check is a structured scoring framework assessing game design documents across six dimensions to reveal design health, actionable trade-offs, and cross-consistency issues before implementation.

Yes, you can apply this six-dimension scoring rubric for pre-implementation RFC validation to ensure thorough analysis, consistent terminology, and structured design health checks before gating feature implementation.

Evaluate cross-consistency by applying section-level prompts within the RFC review workflow to verify coherent terminology, identify alignment gaps, and calculate weighted deductions across interconnected game design systems.

The six-dimension rubric provides quantitative design health scoring but relies on subjective documentation inputs, meaning it cannot evaluate technical implementation feasibility, engineering architecture, or runtime performance outside its defined dimensions.