scholar-evaluation

Evaluate scholarly work with ScholarEval's multi-dimension rubric and generate structured reports.

Updated Feb 15, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/aleph23/Natasha --skill scholar-evaluation-aleph23
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: scholar-evaluation
Source: https://github.com/aleph23/Natasha/tree/main/skills/scholar-evaluation
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/aleph23/Natasha --skill scholar-evaluation-aleph23

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Scholarly work often lacks objective, repeatable assessment; ScholarEval provides a structured framework to quantify quality across multiple scholarly dimensions and generate actionable feedback.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Dimension-based evaluation across Problem Formulation, Literature Review, Methodology, Data Collection, Analysis, Results, Writing, and Citations.
  • Quantitative scoring with weighted aggregation and an attached narrative assessment.
  • Automated report generation and guidance for revisions; integrates with scientific writer workflows and publication-readiness checks.

Quick Start

Score your manuscript using the eight ScholarEval dimensions to generate a structured evaluation report.

Frequently Asked Questions about scholar-evaluation

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I generate a structured peer review report for a research paper?

Generate a structured peer review by scoring your manuscript across eight ScholarEval dimensions like methodology and citations, applying optional weights, and computing a weighted overall score with actionable feedback.

What is a multi-dimension rubric for evaluating scholarly writing?

A multi-dimension rubric for scholarly writing quantifies quality across problem formulation, literature review, methodology, data, analysis, results, writing, and citations to produce objective scores and revision guidance.

Can I weight specific evaluation dimensions differently when scoring a manuscript?

Yes, you can apply optional custom weights to the dimension scores when evaluating a manuscript, allowing the weighted aggregation to reflect specific priorities before generating the final assessment report.

Does the ScholarEval rubric work for evaluating research proposals and literature reviews?

Yes, the ScholarEval rubric applies to research papers, proposals, literature reviews, and academic writing, evaluating dimensions from problem formulation through citations to ensure comprehensive assessment.

What is the best way to assess academic writing quality before publication?

Assess academic writing quality before publication by applying a structured quantitative rubric across eight dimensions, computing a weighted overall score, and generating a report with actionable revision guidance.

How does quantitative peer review scoring handle narrative assessment?

Quantitative peer review scoring attaches a narrative assessment to the weighted dimension scores, combining objective metrics with qualitative feedback to generate a comprehensive structured report.