scope-judge-ja

Determine root-cause sameness and quote scope for Kokonala-style contracts.

Updated Aug 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/riffluv/work1 --skill scope-judge-ja
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: scope-judge-ja
Source: https://github.com/riffluv/work1/tree/main/.codex/skills/scope-judge-ja
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/riffluv/work1 --skill scope-judge-ja

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a repeatable, rule-based method to determine whether a reported issue shares the same root cause or a different one, and whether fixes can be absorbed within the base price or require an additional quote. It also ensures outputs include both a buyer-facing message and an internal case memo, following a consistent policy.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Deterministic judgment: Applies a fixed flow to assess cause sameness and scope.
  • Dual-output generation: Produces customer-facing text and internal notes reflecting the decision.
  • Policy-driven guidance: Uses documented judgement policies to guardrail decisions and phrasing.

Quick Start

Provide a new issue report with symptoms, causes, and affected flows and receive a structured judgment, buyer-facing text, and an internal memo.

Frequently Asked Questions about scope-judge-ja

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I determine if a reported issue shares the same root cause for scope judgment?

To determine if a reported issue shares the same root cause for scope judgment, apply a fixed flow to assess cause sameness. This deterministic process evaluates symptoms and affected flows to decide whether the fix is absorbable in the base price or requires an additional quote.

How do I generate a customer-facing message and internal memo for a scope decision?

You generate a customer-facing message and internal memo for a scope decision by applying a standardized judgment flow. The system produces dual outputs: policy-compliant buyer-facing text and an internal case memo that reflects the decision and rationale while avoiding price figures and unsafe recommendations.

What is the best way to standardize scope decisions across customer contracts?

The best way to standardize scope decisions across customer contracts is to enforce a fixed judgment flow and policy-driven guidance. This ensures consistent assessment of cause sameness and scope, producing standardized outputs that comply with documented policies and avoid unsafe recommendations.

Does scope judgment work for both internal case notes and buyer-facing communication?

Yes, scope judgment works for both internal case notes and buyer-facing communication by generating dual outputs. It produces a buyer-facing message and an internal case memo that both reflect the decision and rationale, ensuring policy-compliant phrasing across all communications.

When should I not include specific price figures in a scope decision output?

You should not include specific price figures in a scope decision output when following policy-compliant phrasing guidelines. The judgment flow enforces standardized output formats that avoid price figures and unsafe recommendations, ensuring compliance with documented judgment policies.