skill-judge

To evaluate SKILL.md quality, use multi-dimensional scoring across eight dimensions to identify gaps, token waste, and activation issues. It assesses skill design against official specs and best practices to generate a structured evaluation report.

Auditing skill packages for specification compliance involves enforcing frontmatter validity and loading triggers. This process assesses design quality against official specs, identifying gaps and anti-patterns to output a structured evaluation report.

Checking SKILL.md files for anti-patterns and activation issues requires assessing the design against best practices. It provides multi-dimensional evaluation across eight dimensions to identify gaps and generate actionable improvement reports.

Yes, you can generate a structured evaluation report for documentation quality by scoring SKILL.md files across eight dimensions. The report includes scores, critical issues, and actionable improvements for skill authors.

Skill evaluation works for reviewing existing SKILL.md packages by auditing them against official specs and best practices. It is ideal for benchmarking new skill designs and guiding improvements to identify gaps and token waste.