tooluniverse-clinical-risk-scoring

Compute and interpret validated bedside clinical risk scores for individual patients.

1.7k|254|Updated Mar 3, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/mims-harvard/ToolUniverse --skill tooluniverse-clinical-risk-scoring
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: tooluniverse-clinical-risk-scoring
Source: https://github.com/mims-harvard/ToolUniverse/tree/main/plugins/tooluniverse/skills/tooluniverse-clinical-risk-scoring
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/mims-harvard/ToolUniverse --skill tooluniverse-clinical-risk-scoring

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Clinicians and analysts often need to translate a patient scenario into the correct validated risk score, gather the right inputs, compute the score accurately, and map the number to a clinical action. Doing this by hand is error-prone and requires memorizing scoring rules and interpretation thresholds.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Scenario-to-score mapping: Selects the right score for the clinical question, including paired scores such as CHA2DS2-VASc with HAS-BLED for anticoagulation decisions and Child-Pugh with MELD-Na for cirrhosis severity.
  • Deterministic calculators: Runs 10 pure-compute tools (CHA2DS2-VASc, HAS-BLED, CURB-65, qSOFA, Child-Pugh, MELD-Na, Wells DVT, Wells PE, ASCVD, eGFR CKD-EPI) that return score, interpretation, and per-factor component breakdowns with no network or API key required.
  • Interpretation tables: Maps each score to clinical actions such as anticoagulation thresholds, admission decisions, sepsis escalation, transplant priority, statin guidance, and CKD staging.
  • Use Case: For a 76-year-old woman with atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and diabetes, compute CHA2DS2-VASc (score 5, anticoagulation recommended) and HAS-BLED (score 3, fix reversible bleeding factors) to weigh anticoagulation.

Quick Start

Ask the assistant to compute the CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores for a 76-year-old female patient with atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and diabetes, and explain whether anticoagulation is recommended.

Frequently Asked Questions about tooluniverse-clinical-risk-scoring

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I calculate CHA2DS2-VASc score for an atrial fibrillation patient?

Run the ClinicalCalc_CHA2DS2_VASc tool with the patient's age and boolean risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes, stroke history, vascular disease, and female sex. It returns the score, an interpretation, and a per-factor component breakdown. Pair it with HAS-BLED to weigh bleeding risk before anticoagulation.

How do I interpret MELD-Na and Child-Pugh scores for cirrhosis?

Child-Pugh classifies chronic severity into classes A, B, and C based on bilirubin, albumin, INR, ascites, and encephalopathy, while MELD-Na estimates 90-day mortality and transplant priority from creatinine, bilirubin, INR, and sodium. Always run both together since each captures a different dimension of liver disease.

What is the difference between Wells DVT and Wells PE scores?

Wells DVT estimates pretest probability for deep vein thrombosis, where a score of 2 or more means DVT is likely and compression ultrasound is indicated. Wells PE estimates pulmonary embolism probability with two-tier and three-tier outputs, where PE likely means CT pulmonary angiography rather than D-dimer alone.

Does the ASCVD risk calculator work for patients over 79 or under 40?

No. The ASCVD Pooled Cohort Equations are validated only for ages 40 to 79 and for White and African-American coefficient sets. They apply to primary prevention only and can mis-estimate risk for other age ranges or ancestries.

Can a low qSOFA score rule out sepsis?

No. qSOFA is a screening tool, not a diagnosis. A score of 0 or 1 indicates lower risk but never excludes sepsis, so reassessment and clinical gestalt remain necessary. A score of 2 or more signals higher risk and warrants escalation and a full sepsis workup.

What are the limitations of these clinical risk calculators?

They are decision-support only and do not replace clinical judgment. Each score was validated in specific populations, eGFR assumes stable kidney function, and MELD-Na and Child-Pugh apply to chronic liver disease only. Inputs are taken at face value, so lab units must be verified before entry.