ux-review

A UX review validates your UX design document by checking for required sections, player-perspective clarity, and testable acceptance criteria. It outputs a structured verdict identifying blocking issues versus advisory gaps to ensure implementation readiness.

A HUD design completeness check validates layout zones, state coverage, and visual budget constraints. It ensures HUD elements align with Game Design Document UI requirements to maintain interface consistency across the player journey.

Checking interaction pattern library compliance involves comparing your new UX specs against established interaction patterns. This process flags inconsistencies with existing library standards and identifies when new patterns need to be formally added for platform-specific input coverage.

Yes, you can review UX specs for accessibility compliance and platform-specific input coverage. The validation process cross-references technical preferences and design requirements to ensure your interface handles diverse player-journey contexts and platform inputs.

Yes, game UX review verifies alignment with the Game Design Document (GDD) by cross-referencing your UX documents against design requirements. This ensures HUD elements and interaction patterns match the intended player experience and technical preferences.

In a UX spec review, blocking issues are critical gaps that prevent implementation readiness, such as missing states or incomplete player-journey context. Advisory issues are non-critical recommendations that do not halt development but should be addressed to improve overall interface quality.