ux-review

Validate UX design documents for completeness, accessibility, and implementation readiness.

Updated Aug 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/nevesb/idol-agency-maker --skill ux-review-nevesb
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ux-review
Source: https://github.com/nevesb/idol-agency-maker/tree/main/.claude/skills/ux-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/nevesb/idol-agency-maker --skill ux-review-nevesb

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

UX design documents often lack completeness, accessibility alignment, or GDD consistency which causes rework, implementation delays, and accessibility regressions; ux-review provides a systematic quality gate to surface those gaps before handoff.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Comprehensive Validation: Checks document headers, purpose, states, interaction maps, data requirements, transitions, localization, and acceptance criteria for completeness.
  • Cross-Reference Checks: Loads platform/input config, accessibility requirements, pattern library, GDDs, and player journey maps to verify alignment and coverage.
  • Targeted Reviews: Supports single-file validation, HUD-specific audits, pattern library checks, or batch reviews across design/ux with structured APPROVED / NEEDS REVISION / MAJOR REVISION NEEDED verdicts.
  • Human-Friendly Outputs: Produces a dated reviewer report with completeness metrics, blocking/advisory issues, GDD alignment notes, accessibility findings, and suggested next steps.

Quick Start

Run /ux-review hud to validate the HUD design and produce an APPROVED/NEEDS REVISION/MAJOR REVISION NEEDED verdict.

Frequently Asked Questions about ux-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I validate UX design specs for accessibility compliance and completeness?

Check UX specs by analyzing document headers, interaction maps, and accessibility tier conformance against pattern libraries and GDDs. This quality gate surfaces gaps before handoff, producing structured APPROVED or NEEDS REVISION verdicts with itemized blocking and advisory issues.

What is the best way to check HUD designs for implementation readiness?

Run a targeted HUD audit to validate design completeness, input method coverage, and accessibility tier conformance. This cross-references player journey maps and GDDs, generating a dated reviewer report with blocking issues and suggested next steps.

Can I perform a batch review of UX documents across a game design pipeline?

Yes, batch reviews support validating all design and UX documents simultaneously. The process checks pattern library consistency, GDD alignment, and localization requirements, outputting comprehensive completeness metrics and structured MAJOR REVISION NEEDED verdicts where needed.

Does UX spec validation check alignment with game design documents and pattern libraries?

Yes, cross-reference checks load platform config, accessibility requirements, GDDs, and pattern libraries to verify alignment. This validates that UX specs maintain consistency with established interaction patterns and overarching game design document requirements.

What limitations should I expect when validating interaction pattern libraries?

Validation focuses on pattern library consistency, completeness, and GDD alignment, requiring properly structured input documents. It surfaces blocking findings and advisory issues but does not auto-repair specs or generate missing design elements.