skills.rest
sheehe
sheeheCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

paper-reviewer

Generate multiple referee reports from a panel of review providers.

Updated Apr 15, 2026
Search Tags:#quality-assurance#multimodel#peer-review#report-generation#research-workflow#ai-critique#referee
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/sheehe/coase --skill paper-reviewer-sheehe
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: paper-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/sheehe/coase/tree/main/resources/plugins/coase-builtin/skills/paper-reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/sheehe/coase --skill paper-reviewer-sheehe

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the creation of multiple referee reports by orchestrating several review providers in parallel, enabling fast, comprehensive critique across design ideas, baseline proposals, and manuscript drafts.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Parallel refereeing: concurrently invoke multiple provider models to produce independent referee reports.
  • Workflow integration: integrates with /review and full_research_workflow, writing outputs to standard paths such as review/reports/{provider_id}.md.
  • Use Case: A research team wants objective, multi-perspective critique of an idea, a baseline approach, and a draft, all in one pass.

Quick Start

Provide a research artifact and a provider group to the system to generate multiple referee reports.

Frequently Asked Questions about paper-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I generate multiple peer-review reports for a manuscript draft simultaneously?▼

To generate multiple peer-review reports, you provide a research artifact and a provider group, which triggers parallel referee reviews and writes provider-specific reports to standardized review paths.

What is parallel refereeing and how does it work for research artifacts?▼

Parallel refereeing concurrently invokes multiple provider models to produce independent referee reports, enabling fast and comprehensive critique across design proposals, baseline methods, and manuscript drafts.

Can I use this automated critique tool for both design proposals and baseline methods?▼

Yes, the automated critique tool processes design proposals, baseline methods, and manuscript drafts, storing the generated outputs under standardized review paths for each provider.

How do I integrate multi-model AI critique into a full research workflow?▼

Multi-model AI critique integrates with full research workflows by running parallel reviews and writing provider-specific reports directly to standard paths like review/reports/{provider_id}.md.

Do I need additional dependencies to run parallel referee reports?▼

No additional dependencies are required; the system operates independently to orchestrate several review providers in parallel for comprehensive research artifact critique.

What is the best way to get objective, multi-perspective critique of a research idea in one pass?▼

The best way to get multi-perspective critique is providing a research artifact to a panel of providers, which concurrently generates independent referee reports for objective analysis.

Related Skills

Explore More Education & Research Skills→
u9401066u9401066
11

concept-development

Validate research concept drafts and assess novelty with reviewer-style critique.

Community
Advanced
CharGrnmnCharGrnmn
1

gpd-respond-to-referees

Parse referee comments, draft structured responses, and track manuscript revisions.

Community
Advanced
andregusman-raizandregusman-raiz
19

ag-revisar-codigo

Automate design-focused code review on PRs and changesets with severity-labeled markdown reports.

Community
Advanced
CharlieGreenmanCharlieGreenman
1

gpd-peer-review

Run a six-pass peer review of manuscripts and research artifacts in a GPD project.

Community
Advanced