peer-review

Automate systematic review of scientific manuscripts and grant proposals.

Updated May 8, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Zeyuyang-0420/bio-ai-research-skills --skill peer-review-zeyuyang-0420
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: peer-review
Source: https://github.com/Zeyuyang-0420/bio-ai-research-skills/tree/main/categories/scientific-communication/peer-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Zeyuyang-0420/bio-ai-research-skills --skill peer-review-zeyuyang-0420

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a structured framework for reviewing scientific manuscripts and grant proposals, enhancing the efficiency and thoroughness of the review process.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured Checklists: Utilizes checklist-based evaluation for methodology, statistics, and reporting standards.
  • Visual Enhancements: Recommends the inclusion of scientific schematics to improve document clarity and communication.
  • Systematic Workflow: Guides through stages of review including initial assessment, detailed section-by-section review, and ethical considerations.
  • Review Report Organization: Offers a structured approach to writing comprehensive peer review reports.

Quick Start

To review a manuscript using the peer-review skill, follow these steps:

  1. Run the script to assess the manuscript scope, novelty, and overall quality.
  2. Conduct a detailed review of each section with specific questions and considerations.
  3. Evaluate the technical quality and reproducibility of the research.
  4. Prepare the review report with a summary statement, major and minor comments, and specific questions for the authors.

Frequently Asked Questions about peer-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I conduct a structured peer review for scientific manuscripts?

Conduct a structured peer review by running the Python script to assess scope and novelty, evaluating methodology section-by-section, checking reporting standards, and generating a report with major and minor comments.

What is the best way to evaluate grant proposals systematically?

Evaluating grant proposals systematically requires checklist-based frameworks to assess technical quality, reproducibility, and ethical considerations, culminating in a structured review report with specific questions for the authors.

How do I write a comprehensive peer review report?

Write a comprehensive peer review report by organizing your findings into a summary statement, detailing major and minor comments, and listing specific questions for authors based on systematic section-by-section evaluation.

Does this peer review skill require Python to run?

Yes, this peer review skill requires Python scripts for analysis and reporting, which automate the systematic evaluation of methodology, statistics, and reporting standards for scientific manuscripts.

Can I use checklists to assess methodology and statistics in research papers?

Yes, you can use structured checklists to assess methodology and statistics in research papers, guiding your initial assessment, detailed section-by-section review, and evaluation of reporting standards and reproducibility.