review-all-gdds

To check cross-document consistency across multiple Game Design Documents, you can automate the review process to detect contradictions, stale references, and formula incompatibilities. This ensures GDD alignment before architecture begins.

Cross-GDD consistency ensures multiple Game Design Documents align without contradictions, stale references, or ownership conflicts. It is important to catch these design inconsistencies early before development architecture begins.

Yes, you can automate game design review to evaluate dominant strategies, economic imbalances, cognitive overload, and competing progression loops. This evaluates overall game design coherence and theory adherence.

You can review multiple GDDs simultaneously by running an automated consistency check with a 'full' argument. This identifies contradictions, stale references, ownership conflicts, and formula incompatibilities across documents.

Yes, you need access to multiple Game Design Documents and knowledge of game design principles to perform a cross-GDD review. The automated process requires multiple documents to check for contradictions and conflicts.

Automating game design document reviews requires access to multiple GDDs and depends on established game design principles. It cannot evaluate unwritten design intent or fix inconsistencies without underlying document access.