review-all-gdds

To check cross-GDD consistency, you analyze all system Game Design Documents to surface dependency asymmetries, stale references, and data ownership conflicts. This automated holistic review prevents rule contradictions and aligns design theory before engineering begins.

Cross-GDD design review is the process of evaluating dependency symmetry, formula compatibility, and acceptance criteria across all system GDDs. You need it to identify design-holism risks and align progression and economy mechanics before starting architecture work.

You generate a cross-GDD review report by running a full scan of your system GDDs to evaluate data ownership and formula compatibility. The output provides structured findings and recommended actions for revision and governance to guide designers and engineers.

Yes, you can use an automated design-theory holistic analysis to find progression, economy, and pillar alignment issues across GDDs. This approach surfaces dependency asymmetries and rule contradictions to inform your architecture decisions.

Automated cross-GDD consistency checks focus strictly on structural issues like dependency symmetry, stale references, and formula compatibility. They cannot replace qualitative design intuition, serving instead to inform governance and highlight risks for manual revision.